~ The MI News ~

Winter 2001, Volume 3, Number 4


Publisher Branton Shearer | Editor Cliff Morris |


Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. Forthcoming New City School MI Institute
3. About the MI Dissertations Citations and Abstracts Database
4. About AERA's Multiple Intelligences: Theory and Practice SIG
5.  Multiple Intelligences Theory and Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives


1. Introduction

If you are a first time visitor to this web site, thanks for clicking here and welcome to this final (of four) editions of the MI newsletter for the 2001 year.  To see previous issues of the MI-News, click here.

This newsletter is produced, published, and provided free to you by Branton Shearer's Multiple Intelligences (MI) Research and Consulting.  The main objective in publishing the MI-News is to provide you with theoretical and practical information about the Howard Gardner model of multiple intelligences and, perhaps more importantly, how this model of our brain and mind is currently being implemented elsewhere.  The newsletter attempts to explore MI applications via discussion, contact and sharing.  Thus, if you have interesting MI ideas, tried-and-tested MI-based lesson plans, or practical MI suggestions which you feel our readership would enjoy using, please e-mail the newsletter's editor, Clifford Morris, with your comments.

As the 2001 Christmas season approaches, we, the staff of the MI-News, hope that this festive time finds you happy, safe, and relaxing with your family members.  And, as you take a few minutes to rest, we hope that the contents of this issue may assist you in some way as you prepare for the forthcoming 2002 year.


2. Forthcoming New City School MI Institute

On April 25-26, 2002, Thomas R. Hoerr, Ph.D., Director of the New City School, on 5209 Waterman Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63108, (voice: 314-361-6411; fax: 314-361-1499) will conduct another MI Institute conference.  This conference will be held over a two-day period.  School will be in session until noon each day, so one option available to participants will be spending time in classrooms!  His previous conferences sold out with 260 people each.  The enrollment at this conference will be limited to approximantely120 participants.  For additional information, please email Dr. Hoerr at trhoerr@newcityschool.org, or visit his web site, at www.newcityschool.org.


3. About the MI Dissertations Citations and Abstracts Database

In the Summer 2001, Volume 3, Number 2 issue of this newsletter, a data base associated with dissertations citations and abstracts of Howard Gardner's MI was first introduced.  In this issue, we continue the commentary again but with additional detail.  Here then are additional specifics about what a user might encounter upon entering this research tool.

First, the user sees the following overview.

The administration of this database is provided by Multiple Intelligences: Theory and Practice a Special Interest Group (SIG) of the American Educational Research Association, Multiple Intelligences Research and Consulting, and Clifford Morris.  The purpose of this research database is to provide a series of MI researched records, that is, records formally researched and reviewed by dissertation thesis committees.  Like learning, this data base is always under construction, as current (2001) citations and abstracts are continuously being added.

Second, the user is presented with two possible search choices.  S/he can select a pre-determined key phrase from a scroll-down menu or can type in a more selective key phrase.

Sample Record

Accession Number: ADG 9826711

Author: Burke, Dorothy M.

EdD

Title: The Relationship of Multiple Intelligences Profiles to Success in Computer-Based Concept Mapping

Subject: Education, Technology. Teacher Training. Cognitive Psychology

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International. Volume: 59-03, Section: A, page: 0790. Year = 1998

Abstract: A concept map is a graphical representation of concepts and their interconnections. Research has shown that concept maps reflect the student's cognitive structure, enabling both teachers and students to determine the level of understanding of material attained before, during or after instruction. Several studies have determined that the addition of the use of a computer-based concept mapping tool for preparing maps increases the level of complexity of students' maps. However, not all students are successful mappers, whether prepared on a computer or drawn with paper-and-pencil. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between pre-service teachers' multiple intelligences profiles, as defined by the work of Howard Gardner (1983), and the levels of complexity in their computer-based concept maps. This study was conducted with pre-service teachers (N = 20) enrolled in a science methods course at a northeastern university graduate program. After an initial questionnaire to determine their computer and academic background and prior exposure to concept mapping, students received instruction on how to develop concept maps and on how to create concept maps using the computer-based concept mapping tool, Inspiration Circler. They completed the MIDAS instrument to determine their individual intelligence profiles. A unit on the 'Phases of the Moon' was taught, after which the subjects took a paper-and-pencil test and then prepared computer-based concept maps of their understanding of the material. The findings in the study substantiated the hypothesis that strengths in multiple intelligences were predictive of success in concept mapping. Using the Pearson product-moment correlation, one intelligence, musical-rhythmic, produced a significant correlation (r = 0.54, p > 5.05) with the level of complexity in the pre-service teachers' concept maps. Ability in music and success in concept mapping both require higher order thinking skills, suggesting that success in concept mapping can be increased among students, when concept mapping is used consciously to develop higher order thinking. Ascertaining students' multiple intelligences profiles can increase teachers' understanding of their cognitive abilities and shed light upon the underlying influences in cognitive tasks such as concept mapping.

Acknowledgement: The dissertation citations and abstract contained here are published with permission of ProQuest Digital Dissertations. A copy of the dissertation may be obtained by addressing your request to UMI® Dissertation Services, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 USA. Telephone (734) 761-7400; Web-page: wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission.

We hope that all of the immediately above may motivate you to take your turn at searching this data base.  And, as mentioned at the outset of this section, the data base continues to be updated with current records.


4. About AERA's Multiple Intelligences: Theory and Practice SIG

In this section of our newsletter, we wish to highlight the Multiple Intelligences (MI) Special Interest Group (SIG) of the American Education Research Association (AERA).  SIG's demonstrate an important function.  They "provide a forum within AERA for the involvement of individuals drawn together by a common interest in a field of study, teaching, or research when the existing divisional structure may not directly facilitate such activity.  The Association provides the SIG's program time at the Annual Meeting, publicity, scheduling, staff support, viability, and the prestige of AERA affiliation. The Association has established a set of guidelines to the SIG's for forming, operating and terminating. A copy of the SIG Policies and Procedures Handbook can be obtained from the AERA Central Office.  The primary responsibility of a SIG to the Association is to maintain a professional support system for its membership consistent with the purpose of the Association as a whole.  All responsibilities, including financial, placed on SIG's by the Association are meant to avoid potential conflicts with existing structure and to partially reimburse the Association for expenditures incurred in the support of the SIG's." (AERA homepage).  To read more about these SIG's, go to http://www.aera.net/sigs/.

Upon arrival at the homepage of the MI-SIG, at http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Column/7568/index.html, the reader will note a series of links, especially developed to inform others about MI.  Please note the Gardner and MI Links section, that is, the third item down from the top in the left-hand column, especially the internet links to adults and multiple intelligences.  In forthcoming issues of this newsletter, we hope focus more on how adults throughout the world are involved in Multiple Intelligences.  If you are aware of others who have interesting projects associated with this interesting model of the mind, please email us with your comments.


5.   Gardner's Multiple Intelligences Theory and Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives

Back in the middle 1950's, one of the central themes within the educational arena was that of Dr. Benjamin Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.  Wherever an educator went, s/he was certain to be introduced to his taxonomy for categorizing different level of abstraction of questions that commonly occurred within educational settings, in particular, inside the regular classroom (Bloom, 1956).  At the time, his taxonomy provided a useful classification structure with which to arrange classroom test questions, as classroom teachers tended to ask questions within particular levels.  It was the theory of the time that if students were able to determine the levels of questions that might appear on their term examinations, that they would thus be better able to study domain content data by utilizing appropriate learning strategies.  In a nutshell, Bloom highlighted some six (6) such questioning and learning strategies.  They ranged in order of cerebral complexity from the basic to the complex, commencing with knowledge, then comprehension, then application, analysis, synthesis, and finally towards the highest cognitive competency, which Bloom termed evaluation.  Now, half a century later, we have also incorporated Howard Gardner's MI model into our daily lesson plans.  To view a table which blends Howard Gardner’s (1983) seven  intelligences to Benjamin Blooms (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, go to http://members.ozemail.com.au/~mickday/australi.htm.  Enjoy the comparisons!

Reference

Bloom, B. S. (Ed.) (1956).  Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York ; Toronto: Longmans, Green.


5b.  More MI internet links

1.      The Theory of Multiple Intelligences

2.      Capitol School Online

3.      The Gale Encyclopedia of Psychology and Howard Earl Gardner

4.      The New School of Northern Virginia

5.      Why teachers are drawn to using Multiple Intelligence Theory in their classrooms


Send mail to Clifford Morris with questions or comments about this web site